State Department and Related Agencies FY2002 Appropriations

CRS Report for Congress
State Department and Related Agencies
FY2002 Appropriations
Updated February 1, 2002
Susan B. Epstein
Specialist in Foreign Policy and Trade
Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division


Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

State Department and Related Agencies
FY2002 Appropriations
Summary
On April 9, 2001, the President submitted his FY2002 budget request which
included nearly $8 billion for the Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of
Governors (BBG). This represents an increase of $925 million (or 13.1%) from the
FY2001 enacted level which Congress passed and the President signed into law (P.L.

106-553) on October 27,2000.


On June 27, 2001 the House Commerce, Justice, State (CJS) Subcommittee
passed by voice vote its FY2002 appropriations. The full House Appropriations
Committee reported out the CJS legislation (H.Rept. 107-139) on July 10, 2001, and
set State Department funding at $7.4 billion for FY2002. After transferring $15
million out of two of State’s accounts – $8 million from Diplomatic and Consular
Programs and $7 million from the Capital Investment Fund – and moving the funds
into the Small Business Administration, the House passed the bill (H.R. 2500) on July

18th, funding State at $7.39 billion.


On July 19th the Senate Appropriations Committee marked up the CJS
appropriations (S. 1215) and filed its report (S.Rept. 107-42). The Senate version
provided $7.2 billion for the State Department in FY2002. The Senate passed its
version of H.R. 2500, as amended, on September 13, 2001.
In response to the September 11th attacks, Congress passed the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-38) totaling $40 billion. Of that total, the
State Department received $390,000 for Diplomatic and Consular Programs, $7.5
million for its Capital Investment Fund, and $41 million for Emergencies in the
Diplomatic and Consular Service account. These funds will be used for overseas
personnel evacuations, information and reward money for apprehending terrorists, and
improvement of emergency communications technology at U.S. and overseas
facilities. Additionally, the emergency supplemental provided $12.25 million to the
BBG for increased Arabic and other language broadcast services related to the war
on terrorism.
In the absence of a signed CJS appropriation, the following continuing
resolutions kept the State Department running into the new fiscal year: H.J.Res.65
(P.L. 107-44) which expired October 16th, H.J.Res. 68 (P.L. 107-48) which expired
October 23rd, H.J.Res. 69 (P.L. 107-53) which expired October 31st, and H.J.Res. 70th
(P.L. 107-58) which expired November 16, and H.J.Res. 74 (P.L. 107-70) which
expired December 7, 2001.
The House adopted the conference report (H.Rept. 107-278) by a vote of 411-th

15 on November 14 and the Senate adopted it by a vote of 98-1 the following day.


The President signed the bill into law (P.L. 107-77) on November 28, 2001.



Contents
Background .................................................... 1
State Department................................................2
Administration of Foreign Affairs................................2
International Organizations and Conferences.......................4
International Commissions.....................................5
Related State Department Appropriations.........................5
Broadcasting Board of Governors...................................6
List of Tables
Table 1. State Department, USIA, and Related Agencies Appropriations.....8



State Department and Related Agencies
FY2001 Appropriations
Background
Budgets for the Department of State and the Broadcasting Board of Governors
(BBG), as well as U.S. contributions to United Nations (U.N.) International
Organizations, and U.N. Peacekeeping, are within the Commerce, Justice, State and
Related Agency (CJS) appropriations. Intertwined with the annual appropriations
process is the biannual Foreign Relations Authorization that, by law, Congress must
pass prior to the State Department’s expenditure of its appropriations.
Secretary of State Colin Powell testified on the FY2002 State Department
appropriations request before House and Senate Committees in February and March
2001. The Administration’s budget request for the Department of State was released
March 12, 2001, although the Administration officially sent the FY2002 budget
request to Congress on April 9, 2001.
The Administration’s FY2002 State Department and BBG budget request
totaled nearly $8 billion, more than 13% above the FY2001 enacted funding level
(P.L. 106-553). Increased hiring, improving information technology, and overseas
security funding were the three key issues in the State Department portion of the
FY2002 CJS appropriations debate. (For more details on security issues, see CRS
Report 98-771, Embassy Security: Background, Funding, and the Budget.)
In the wake of the September 11th attack, Congress passed the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act (P.L. 107-38) which provides State with $390,000
for Diplomatic and Consular Programs, $7.5 million for its Capital Investment Fund,
and $41 million for Emergencies in the Diplomatic and Consular Service account.
These funds will be used for overseas personnel evacuations, information and reward
money for apprehending terrorists, and improvement of emergency communications
technology at U.S. and overseas facilities. International broadcasting received
supplemental funds totaling $12.25 million for expanding VOA and RFE/RL
broadcasts in Arabic and the many languages in and around Afghanistan.
The House adopted the CJS appropriations conference report (H.Rept. 107-278)th
by a vote of 411-15 on November 14 and the Senate adopted it by a vote of 98-1 the
following day. On November 28, 2001, the President signed it into law (P.L.

107-77).



State Department
The State Department’s mission is to advance and protect the worldwide
interests of the United States and its citizens through the staffing of overseas missions,
the conduct of U.S. foreign policy, the issuance of passports and visas, and other
responsibilities. Currently, the State Department coordinates with the activities of 50
U.S. government agencies and organizations in operating 257 posts in over 180
countries around the world. The Department’s staff size has increased, largely
because of the integration of ACDA and USIA into State. Highlights follow. (See
Table 1. State Department, USIA, and Related Agencies Appropriations below for
account-by-account and recent years’ appropriations.)
Administration of Foreign Affairs
Diplomatic and Consular Programs (D&CP) – The D&CP account funds
overseas operations (e.g., motor vehicles, local guards, telecommunications, medical),
activities associated with conducting foreign policy, passport and visa applications,
regional bureaus, under secretaries, and post assignment travel. Beginning in
FY2000, the State Department’s Diplomatic and Consular Program account included
State’s salaries and expenses, as well as the technology and information functions of
the former USIA, and the functions of the former ACDA. The FY2001 enacted level
was $3.167 billion with $409 million for worldwide security upgrades.
The Bush Administration requested for D&CP’s FY2002 level a 17% increase
– to $3,705.1 million – largely for both Foreign and Civil Service personnel. In
addition, the Administration advocated hiring floats – staff that could fill in while
others are attending training classes.
The House Appropriations Committee set funding for this account at $3,653.7
million, including $487.7 million for worldwide security upgrades, in FY2002. The
House transferred $8 million from D&CP and into the Small Business Administration,
recommending the final D&CP total to be $3,645.7 million.
The Senate set DC&P funding at $3,471.2 million, including $409.4 million for
worldwide security upgrades, the same as the current level. The Senate Committee
had not recommended full funding, as requested, for hiring 186 Diplomatic Security
agents. The Committee expressed concern that such an increase in hiring would
create a disproportionate number of rookie versus seasoned agents, resulting in a loss
of effectiveness.
Congress enacted $3,630 million for the diplomatic and consular programs
account for FY2002, nearly the House-passed amount, including $487.7 million for
worldwide security upgrades. The funding supports the hiring of 360 new employees
in FY2002, 186 diplomatic security employees (including 86 special agents), and
allows the Department to collect and deposit Machine Readable Visa fees as offsetting
collections to the D&CP account for FY2002 and FY2003. In addition, Congress had
approved emergency supplemental DC&P funding of $390,000 for possible
evacuation needs related to terrorist attacks.



Embassy Security, Construction and Maintenance (ESCM) – This account
supports the maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement of overseas facilities to
provide appropriate, safe, secure and functional facilities for U.S. diplomatic missions
abroad. Congress originally had enacted $640 million for this account for FY1999.
However, following the embassy bombings in Africa in August 1998, Congress
agreed to more than $1 billion (within a supplemental funding bill) for the Security
and Maintenance account by establishing a new subaccount referred to as Worldwide
Security Upgrades. The enacted FY2001appropriation included $416 million for
regular ESCM and $661.2 million for Worldwide Security Upgrades.
The FY2002 request was $475 million for ongoing ESCM and $816 million for
Worldwide Security Upgrades. This 23.4% increase would be for both ongoing
expenses of security programs in place already, as well as increasing security in certain
locations, according to State Department officials.
The House approved $470 million for ongoing maintenance and construction
and agreed with $816 million for embassy security. The Senate passed $405 million
for ESCM activities and $661.6 million for worldwide security upgrades in embassies.
The final FY2002 appropriation for ESCM is $1,274 million, including $458
million for regular ESCM and $816 million for worldwide security upgrades.
Educational and Cultural Exchanges – This account funds programs authorized
by the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act of 1961, such as the Fulbright
Academic Exchange Program, as well as leadership programs for foreign leaders and
professionals. Government exchange programs have come under close scrutiny in
recent years for being excessive in number and duplicative. As a result, a July 1997
executive order created the Office of U.S. Government International Exchange and
Training Coordination. For FY2001, Congress passed $231.6 million ($6 million
more than requested) for the international exchanges account, including $115.3
million for the Fulbright Program. The Administration requested $242 million for the
Education and Cultural Exchange account in FY2002. The House bill set funding
at $237 million ($5 million less than requested) for educational and cultural exchange
programs in FY2002. The Senate passed the full amount requested–$242 million.
Congress agreed to the House’s $237 million, including $118 million for the Fulbright
programs in FY2002.
The Capital Investment Fund (CIF) – CIF was established by the Foreign
Relations Authorization Act of FY1994/95 (P.L. 103-236) to provide for purchasing
information technology and capital equipment which would ensure the efficient
management, coordination, operation, and utilization of State’s resources. In FY1998
Congress approved a 250% increase in this fund, from $24.6 million in FY1997 to
$86 million in FY1998. The Administration sought $118.3 million (an increase of
38%) in FY1999 for CIF. Congress exceeded the request, agreeing to $158.6 million
for this account, which included funds from the emergency supplemental
appropriation for Y2K compliance. For FY2000, Congress agreed to $79.7 million
and for FY2001 appropriated $96.8 million–essentially the Clinton Administration’s
request for CIF.



In the early months of 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell testified before both
House and Senate foreign affairs committees that the State Department is in dire need
of improvements in its information technology. The FY2002 request of $210 million
(117% above the previous year) would put full Internet capability on every desktop
at State and improve communications technology overall for State Department
personnel, according to the Secretary’s testimony.
The House Appropriations Committee agreed with the Administration request,
but a floor amendment transferred $7 million from this account and into the Small
Business Administration. The Senate Appropriations Committee agreed with the
$210 million requested by the Administration for CIF. After the September 11th
attack, Congress recognized the urgency for immediate improvements in
communication technology and passed the emergency supplemental (P.L. 107-38)
which included $7.5 million for CIF for improving emergency communications
capabilities overseas and in the Washington office. In addition to this supplemental,
Congress passed $203 million for CIF FY2002 appropriation, matching the House
level. The conference report included $102.7 million for information technology
investments within the DC&P account and also noted that an additional $63 million
from expedited passport fees will go toward CIF in FY2002.
International Organizations and Conferences
In recent years, U.S. contributions to U.N. international organizations and
peacekeeping activities have been complicated by a number of issues, such as
withholding funds in the past because of international family planning policies. Earlier
in 2001, some controversial issues included: 1) the recent loss of the U.S. seat on the
U.N. Commission on Human Rights, 2) the lack of a formal nomination of a U.S.
Ambassador to the United Nations, and 3) the nonpayment by the United States of
$582 million in arrearages to the U.N.
Contributions to International Organizations (CIO) – CIO provides funds for
U.S. membership in numerous international organizations and for multilateral foreign
policy activities that transcend bilateral issues, such as human rights. Maintaining a
membership in international organizations, the Administration argues, benefits the
United States by advancing U.S. interests and principles while sharing the costs with
other countries. Payments to the U.N. and its affiliated agencies, the Inter-American
Organizations, as well as other regional and international organizations are included
in this account. Congress enacted $869 million for CIO in FY2001. The FY2002
request was $878.8 million. The House agreed to less than requested for this
account, setting the funding at $850 million for FY2002. The Senate passed $1,091.3
million for CIO–$212.6 million more than requested because of synchronization of
payments and expected FY2001 payments. The final enacted appropriation totaled the
House level of $850.0 million.
Shortly after the September 11th terrorist attack and at a time when the U.S.
government was seeking U.N. support in its coalition to fight terrorism, Congress
passed, and the President signed, legislation (S. 248/P.L. 107-46) which allowed the
United States to make its second tranche ($475 million) of arrearage payments to the
U.N. (For more detail, see CRS Issue Brief IB86116, U.N. System Funding:
Congressional Issues, by Vita Bite.)



Contributions to International Peacekeeping Activities (CIPA) — The United
States supports multilateral peacekeeping efforts around the world through payment
of its share of the U.N. assessed peacekeeping budget. Congress approved $844
million for this account for FY2001. The Bush Administration requested to continue
this funding level for FY2002; the House agreed. The Senate voted to reduce the
amount to $773.2 million, expressing a skepticism that the Revolutionary United
Front (RUF) in Sierra Leone is serious about attaining peace. Congress finally passed
the House and Administration-requested level of $844.1 million for FY2002. (For
more detail, see CRS Issue Brief IB90103, United Nations Peacekeeping: Issues for
Congress, by Marjorie Ann Browne.)
International Commissions
The International Commissions account includes the U.S.-Mexico Boundary and
Water Commission, the International Fisheries Commissions, the International
Boundary Commission, the International Joint Commission, and the Border
Environment Cooperation Commission. The FY2001 enacted level for International
Commissions totaled $56.1 million. The FY2002 request would have raised this
funding by 12.7% to $63.2 million. The House set funding at $60.3 million for
International Commissions in FY2002. The Senate passed a total of $59.3 million.
The final enacted level equals $60.5 million.
Related State Department Appropriations
The Asia Foundation – The Asia Foundation is a private, nonprofit organization
that supports efforts to strengthen democratic processes and institutions in Asia, open
markets, and improve U.S.-Asian cooperation. The Foundation receives both
government and private sector contributions. Government funds for the Asia
Foundation are appropriated to, and pass through, the State Department. Congress
funded The Asia Foundation at $9.2 million for FY2001. The Administration
requested a continuation of this funding level for FY2002. The House agreed, but the
Senate recommended reducing the funding to $8 million for FY2002. The FY2002
enacted level for the Asia Foundation matched the House and White House level of
$9.3 million.
National Endowment for Democracy (NED) – The National Endowment for
Democracy, a private nonprofit organization established during the Reagan
Administration, supports programs to strengthen democratic institutions in more than
90 countries around the world. NED proponents assert that many of its
accomplishments are possible because it is not a government agency. NED’s critics
claim that it duplicates U.S. government democracy programs and either could be
eliminated or could operate entirely with private funding. NED’s FY2001 enacted
appropriation was a continuation of the previous year’s level of $30.9 million. The
Bush Administration requested continuing this level for NED in FY2002. The House
voted to raise NED’s funding for FY2002 to $33.5 million, while the Senate agreed
to $31 million. The final FY2002 enacted level for NED was $33.5 million.
East-West and North-South Centers – The Center for Cultural and Technical
Interchange between East and West (East-West Center), located in Honolulu, Hawaii,



was established in 1960 by Congress to promote understanding and cooperation
among the governments and peoples of the Asia/Pacific region and the United States.
The Center for Cultural and Technical interchange between North and South (North-
South Center) is a national educational institution in Miami, FL, closely affiliated with
the University of Miami. It promotes better relations, commerce, and understanding
among the nations of North America, South America and the Caribbean. The North-
South Center began receiving a direct subsidy from the federal government in 1991.
In FY2001, Congress provided $13.5 million for the East-West Center, but no funds
for the North-South Center. (The North-South Center received $1.4 million from
the Education and Cultural Exchanges account in FY2001.) The Bush Administration
requested to continue funding the East-West Center at $13.5 million, with no funding
to the North-South Center. The House agreed to $9.4 million for the East-West
Center in FY2002, urging the Center to seek private grants. In contrast, the Senate
agreed to increasing NED’s FY2002 funding to $14 million, $500,000 above the
President’s request. The final FY2002 enacted appropriation equaled the Senate level
of $14 million.
Broadcasting Board of Governors
The United States International Broadcasting Act of 19941 reorganized within
USIA all U.S. government international broadcasting, including Voice of America
(VOA), Broadcasting to Cuba, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Radio
Free Asia (RFA), and the newly-approved Radio Free Iraq and Radio Free Iran. The
Act established the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) to oversee all U.S.
government broadcasting; abolished the Board for International Broadcasting (BIB),
the administering body of RFE/RL; and recommended that RFE/RL be privatized by
December 31, 1999. This recommendation was repealed by P.L. 106-113.
During reorganization debate in 1999, the 105th Congress agreed that credibility
of U.S. international broadcasting was crucial to its effectiveness as a public
diplomacy tool. Therefore, Congress agreed not to merge broadcasting functions into
the State Department, but to maintain the Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG)
as an independent agency as of October 1, 1999.
For FY2001, Congress enacted a total of $440.4 million for international
broadcasting, including $22.1 million for Cuba Broadcasting. The BBG’s total funds
that year also included $20.3 million for a Broadcasting Capital Improvements
account (formerly USIA’s Radio Construction account) which funds the building or
renovating of radio stations, upgrading and refurbishing station capabilities, updating
technology, and replacing old transmitters. For FY2002, the Administration requested
a total international broadcasting budget of $470 million, including $16.9 million for
Capital Improvements and $24.9 million for Broadcasting to Cuba.
The House passed a total of $479 million for international broadcasting in
FY2002–$453 million for international broadcasting operations and $25.9 million for


1 Title III of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995, P.L. 103-

236.



Broadcasting Capital Improvements. Also in the total, the House agreed to $24.9
million for Cuba Broadcasting and $25.2 million for Radio Free Asia. The Senate
recommended a total of $456.5 million, including $16.9 million for Capital
Improvements and $24.9 million for Cuba Broadcasting. The final enacted FY2002
appropriation totaled $479 million, including $25.9 million for Capital Improvements
and $24.9 million for Cuba Broadcasting.
In addition to the annual appropriation, and in response to the September 11th
attack, Congress passed the emergency supplemental (P.L. 107-38) which provided
the BBG with $12.25 million to support VOA broadcasts in Arabic, Farsi, Pashto,
Dari, and Urdu, and RFE/RL broadcasts in Arabic, Farsi, Tajik, Turkmen, Uzbek,
Kazakh, Krygyz, and Azeri in FY2002.



CRS-8
Table 1. State Department, USIA, and Related Agencies Appropriations
(millions of dollars)
FY1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002 House Senate FY2002
Enacted Enacted Enacted Enacted Request Enacted

1,730.0 1,661.6 2,823.8 3,167.2 3,705.1 3,645.7 3,471.2 3,630.0 a


363.5 354.2 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


(254.0) (409.1) (487.7) -.- (409.4) (487.7)
[427.1] 453.8 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-
[5.1] 11.6 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-
197.7 200.5 204.2 231.1 242.0 237.0 242.0 237.0
iki/CRS-RL30926 27.5 28.5 27.4 28.4 29.3 29.3 28.4 29.0
g/w 4.2 4.4 5.8 6.5 9.0 6.5 9.0 6.5
s.or 7.9 8.1 8.1 15.4 10.0 9.4 10.0 9.4
leak
397.9 1,081.1 739.4 1,077.6 1,291.0 1,286.0 1,067.0 1,274.0
://wiki -.- (785.7) (313.6) (661.2) (816.0) (816.0) (661.6) (816.0)
http 5.5 17.5 5.5 5.5 15.5 10.0 5.5 6.5 b
1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
14.0 14.8 15.3 16.3 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
129.9 132.5 128.5 131.2 135.6 135.6 135.6 135.6

86.0 158.6 79.7 96.8 210.0 203.0 210.0 203.0 c


2,773.7 4,914.1 4,038.9 4,777.2 5,665.7 5,580.7 5,224.1 5,549.2
955.5 933.6 880.5 868.9 878.8 850.0 1,091.3 850.0
256.0 219.4 498.1 844.2 844.1 844.1 773.2 844.1

475.0 351.0 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


1,211.5 1,628.0 1,729.6 1,713.1 1,722.9 1,694.1 1,864.5 1,694.1

44.0 45.8 48.7 56.1 63.2 60.3 59.3 60.5



CRS-9
FY1998 FY1999 FY2000 FY2001 FY2002 House Senate FY2002
Enacted Enacted Enacted Enacted Request Enacted

8.0 8.3 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


4,037.3 6,596.2 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


8.2 9.2 9.3 9.3 8.0 9.3
30.0 31.0 30.9 30.9 31.0 33.5 31.0 33.5
12.0 12.5 12.5 13.5 13.5 9.4 14.0 14.0

1.5 1.8 1.8 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4
44.5 46.2 54.2 54.4 54.6 53.1 53.9 57.7
iki/CRS-RL30926 –.– –.– 5,871.4 6,600.8 7,506.4 7,388.2 7,174.6 7,361.5
g/w
s.or
leak 40.0 13.2 11.3 20.3 16.9 25.9 16.9 25.9
d
://wiki 391.5 362.4 388.4 398.1 428.2 453.1 414.7 428.2
http (22.1) 22.1 22.1 22.1 24.9 -.- 24.9 24.9
(25.0) -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-
431.5 397.7 420.2 440.5 470.0 479.0 456.5 479.0

1,105.9 1,108.7 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


41.5 41.5 -.- -.- -.- -.- -.- -.-


5,184.7 7,040.1 6,291.6 7,041.3 7,976.4 7,867.2 7,631.1 7,840.5
th attacks.