Credit Rating Agency Regulatory Reform: A Side-by-Side Comparison of H.R. 2990 and S. 3850

CRS Report for Congress
Credit Rating Agency Regulatory Reform:
A Side-by-Side Comparison of
H.R. 2990 and S. 3850
September 19, 2006
Gary Shorter
Specialist in Business and Government Relations
Government and Finance Division


Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress

Credit Rating Agency Regulatory Reform:
A Side-by-Side Comparison of
H.R. 2990 and S. 3850
Summary
Credit rating agencies assess the probability that a securities issuer will default
by failing to repay principal and interest on the security. Globally, there are about
130 agencies, but Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) combine for about 80% of
overall market share, with Fitch accounting for about a 15% share.
In 1975, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued the Net Capital
Rule, which set new capital requirements for broker-dealers and required them to
take a larger discount on their bond holdings deemed to be below investment grade
by a rating agency that it recognized as a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (NRSRO). Since then, a growing number of federal, state, and foreign
government statutes and regulations have adopted NRSRO ratings as reference points
or triggers. However, there is no statutory definition of an NRSRO. When a rating
agency requests NRSRO status, it applies to the SEC Division of Market Regulation
for NRSRO designation, a decision-making process that is often both uncertain and
of an indefinite time span.
Currently, five rating agencies have NRSRO designation: Fitch; Moody’s;
S&P; the A.M. Best Company, which rates insurance and reinsurance firms; and the
Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited, a Canadian-based firm.
Like other providers of financial market analysis, the major NRSROs play a
critical role as financial sentries or gatekeepers whose assessments can help warn
against corporate meltdowns. Their record, however, is imperfect. For example, in
2001, Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch issued favorable credit ratings of WorldCom bonds
three months before the company declared bankruptcy. Additional concerns exist
over the way in which the NRSRO process may impede non-NRSROs’ access to
more profitable segments of the rating industry.
In the 109th Congress, two legislative responses to the perceived shortcomings
of the NRSRO protocol are H.R. 2990 (Fitzpatrick), the Credit Rating Agency
Duopoly Relief Act of 2006, which passed the House on July 12, 2006, and S. 3850
(Shelby), the Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, which was voted out of the
Senate Banking and Urban Affairs Committee on August 2, 2006. Both bills would
scrap the current NRSRO designation process and instead would allow entities with
at least three consecutive years as rating agencies to register with the SEC as
NRSROs. S. 3850 would permit the SEC to reject a rating agency’s application for
NRSRO registration if it determined that the rater lacked sufficient financial and
managerial resources, whereas H.R. 2990 would impose no such test. Each bill, if
enacted, would be likely to significantly expand the number of NRSROs.
This report provides a side-by-side comparison of the bills’ major provisions;
it will be updated as events dictate.



Contents
In troduction ......................................................1
List of Tables
Table 1. A Comparison of Major Provisions of H.R. 2990 and S. 3850.......3



Credit Rating Agency Regulatory Reform:
A Side-by-Side Comparison of
H.R. 2990 and S. 3850
Introduction
Credit rating agencies assess the probability that a securities issuer will default
by failing to repay principal and interest on the security. Two rating agencies
dominate the rating industry — Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) who combine
for about 80% of the overall market share. Fitch Ratings has about a 15% share.
Globally, there are about 130 agencies.
In 1975, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued the Net Capital
Rule, which set new capital requirements for broker-dealers and required them to
take a larger discount on their bond holdings deemed to be below investment grade
by a rating agency that it recognized as a nationally recognized statistical rating
organization (NRSRO). Since then, a growing number of federal, state, and foreign
government statutes and regulations have adopted NRSRO ratings as reference points
or triggers. But there is no statutory definition of an NRSRO. When a rating agency
requests NRSRO status, it applies to the SEC Division of Market Regulation for
NRSRO designation. And through what is known as the no-action letter process,1 the
division can take an indefinite amount of time to determine whether to grant the
designation, a decision that is significantly based on whether the applicant is a
nationally recognized issuer of credible ratings.
Currently, five rating agencies have NRSRO designations: Fitch; Moody’s;
S&P; the A.M. Best Company, which rates insurance and reinsurance firms and
received NRSRO status in 2005; and the Dominion Bond Rating Service Limited, a
Canadian-based firm that was granted NRSRO status in 2003.
In addition to other sources of financial market analysis like securities analysts,
the major NRSROs also play a critical role as financial sentries or gatekeepers whose
assessments can help warn against corporate meltdowns. Their record, however, is
imperfect. In 2001, Moody’s, S&P, and Fitch issued favorable credit ratings of
WorldCom bonds three months before the company declared bankruptcy. Moody’s
and S&P provided favorable bond ratings for Enron corporate bonds just before the
firm’s bankruptcy. The collapse of these firms eventually cost investors billions of


1 A no-action letter is an SEC communication stipulating that the agency does not object to
a course of action proposed by a registrant. They are generally issued after an applicant has
made a request.

dollars and provoked widespread criticism of the agencies both in and out of
Congress.
These concerns, to which the NRSROs respond that they were themselves the
victims of corporate deceit, exist alongside criticism that the NRSRO selection
process is an anticompetitive mechanism that impedes non-NRSROs’ access to the
more profitable segments of the rating industry.
The congressional response to the perceived problems surrounding the NRSRO
process and its potentially undesirable consequences has led to the introduction of
two bills in the 109th Congress. H.R. 2990 (Fitzpatrick), the Credit Rating Agency
Duopoly Relief Act of 2006, passed the House on July 12, 2006, in a vote closely
divided along partisan lines. Soon afterwards, on August 2, S. 3850 (Shelby), the
Credit Rating Agency Reform Act of 2006, was voted out of the Senate Banking and
Urban Affairs Committee with significant bipartisan support.
Both bills would scrap the SEC’s current no-action-letter-based NRSRO
designation process with its central focus on whether an agency is nationally
recognized as an issuer of credible ratings, and with its indefinite decision making
time frames. Both would amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to allow
interested entities with at least three consecutive years as rating agencies to register
with the SEC as NRSROs, which would involve the submission of performance
measurement statistics, a description of their rating methodology, details of ethics
policies, and disclosure of conflicts of interest. Under both bills, once the SEC
received a credit agency’s application to register as an NRSRO, it would have up to
120 days — with the possibility of an extension if deemed necessary — to determine
whether to deny or grant the registration.
S. 3850 would allow the SEC to reject a rating agency’s application for NRSRO
registration if it determined the applicant lacked sufficient financial and managerial
resources. H.R. 2990 has no such requirement.
S. 3850 would require NRSRO applicants to provide written certifications from
at least 10 of their institutional customers to the SEC. Applicants would also have
to provide a list of their 20 largest issuers and subscribers by the amount of net
revenues received in the previous year. Neither provision is part of H.R. 2990.
S. 3850 would also direct the SEC to issue rules on NRSRO conflicts of interest
and the misuse of non-public information conflicts of interest, provisions that are
absent from H.R. 2990.
Either bill, if enacted, would be likely to significantly expand the number of
NRSROs from the current five.
This report compares the major provisions of the two legislative proposals. Key
differences between the two bills have been italicized.



Table 1. A Comparison of Major Provisions of
H.R. 2990 and S. 3850
ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
Cessation of the SECsWithin 30 days after the Upon a designated effective
current No-Action Letter-legislations enactment, thedate, an entity that previously
based NRSRO designationSEC shall cease to designaterelied on the SECs no-action
processpersons and companies asletter for its NRSRO status
NRSROs as it currently may continue to use the
under rule 15c3-1 of thedesignation if it has filed an
agencys rules (17 CFRapplication for NRSRO
240.15c3-1). In addition, theregistration that has been
SECs current no-actionapproved by the SEC.
process for NRSRO(Section 4)
designation would be voided.
(Section 4)
Defining a credit ratingA credit agency is defined asA credit agency is defined as
agencyan entity that is engaged inan entity that is engaged in
the business of issuing creditthe business of issuing credit
ratings on the Internet orratings on the Internet or
through another readilythrough another readily
accessible means, for free oraccessible means, for free or
for a reasonable fee thatfor a reasonable fee that
employs either a quantitativeaemploys either a quantitative
or qualitative model, or both,or qualitative model; or both,
and receives fees from eitherand receives fees from either
issuers, investors, or otherissuers, investors, or other
market participants. market participants.
(Section 3)(Section 3)
Credit rating agencyTo register as an NRSROTo register as an NRSRO
experience needed towith the SEC, a credit ratingwith the SEC: (1) a credit
qualify for registration asagency must have been inrating agency must have been
an NRSRObusiness for at least threein business for at least three
consecutive years. consecutive years; and (2)
(Section 3)have received written
certifications from at least 10
“qualified institutional
buyers” (as defined in section
230.144 (a) of title 17, Code
of Federal Regulations).
(Section 3)



ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
What the SEC is authorizedThe SEC is authorized toThe SEC is authorized to
to require of credit ratingrequire a credit rating agencyrequire a credit rating agency
agencies interested inthat elects to be registered asthat elects to be registered as
registering as NRSROsan NRSRO to filean NRSRO to file
information that may includeinformation that may include
(1) any conflicts of interest(1) any conflicts of interest
relating to the issuance ofrelating to the issuance of
credit ratings; (2) thecredit ratings; (2) the
procedures andprocedures and
methodologies used inmethodologies used in
determining credit ratings; (3) determining credit ratings; (3)
their credit ratingstheir credit ratings
performance measurementperformance measurement
statistics over short-term,statistics over short-term,
mid-term, and long-termmid-term, and long-term
periods; (4) policies orperiods; (4) policies or
procedures adopted andprocedures adopted and
implemented to prevent theimplemented to prevent the
misuse of material,misuse of material,
non-public information; andnon-public information; (5)
(5) its organizationalits organizational structure;
structure. (Section 4)(6) a confidential list of the
20 largest issuers and
subscribers by the amount of
net revenues received in the
fiscal year prior to the
application date; and (7)
written certifications from at
least 10 “qualified
institutional buyers who
have used the applicant’s
ratings. (Section 4)
The SEC’s review of anWithin 90 days after anWithin 90 days after an
NRSRO applicationapplicant has filed forapplicant has filed for
registration, the SEC shallregistration, the SEC shall
either grant NRSROeither grant NRSRO
registration or beginregistration or begin
proceedings to determineproceedings to determine
whether registration shouldwhether registration should
be denied. The proceedingsbe denied. The proceedings
shall end within 120 daysshall end within 120 days
from the date that thefrom the date that the
application was furnished andapplication was received and
shall involve a determinationshall involve a determination
by the SEC on whether theby the SEC on whether the
applicant is granted or deniedapplicant is granted or denied
NRSRO registration. If theNRSRO registration. If the
agency finds sufficient causeagency finds sufficient cause
for an extension, it mayfor an extension, it may
extend the NRSROextend the NRSRO
registration proceeding for upregistration proceeding for up
to 90 additional days. to 90 additional days, or for
(Section 4)longer periods with the
applicant’s consent.
(Section 4)



ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
Grounds for the SEC’sThe SEC shall grant NRSROThe SEC shall grant NRSRO
decision to approve anregistration if it finds that theregistration if it finds that the
applicants registration asrequirements of the precedingrequirements of the preceding
an NRSROsection are satisfied. It shallsection are satisfied. The
deny the registration if it doesagency shall deny
not make such a finding. Inregistration if it finds that the
the event that the applicant isapplicant does not have
already registered, that adequate financial and
registration would be subjectmanagerial resources to
to suspension or revocation.consistently produce ratings
(Section 4)with integrity and that
comply with its procedures
and methodology (as dis-
closed above). In the event
that the applicant is already
registered, that registration
would be subject to
suspension or revocation.
(Section 4)
Requirements for updatingGenerally, credit agenciesGenerally, credit agencies
an applicant’s informationthat have gained NRSOthat have gained NRSO
registration would beregistration would be
required to promptly amendrequired to promptly amend
their applications with thetheir applications with the
SEC if developments haveSEC if developments have
rendered previous disclosuresrendered previous disclosures
to be materially inaccurate. to be materially inaccurate.
And not later than 90 daysAnd not later than 90 days
after the end of each calendarafter the end of each calendar
year, they would also have toyear, they would also have to
file registration amendmentsfile registration amendments
with the agency, certifyingwith the agency, certifying
the accuracy of theirthe accuracy of their
disclosures and identifyingdisclosures and identifying
any material changes sinceany material changes since
the previous year’s filings.the previous year’s filings.
(Section 4)(Section 4)



ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
The elements of the SEC’sThe SEC would have theThe SEC would have the
authority to enforceauthority to take actionauthority to take action
NRSRO accountabilityagainst NRSROs who violate against NRSROs who violate
the procedures, criteria, andthe procedures, criteria, and
methodologies contained in methodologies contained in
registration applications. Itregistration applications. It
also would authorize thealso would authorize the
agency to censure, placeagency to censure, place
limitations on the activities,limitations on the activities,
functions, or operations of,functions, or operations of,
suspend for a period notsuspend for a period not
exceeding 12 months, orexceeding 12 months, or
revoke the registration of anyrevoke the registration of any
NRSRO or person associatedNRSRO or person associated
with an NRSRO has beenwith an NRSRO has been
found to: a) have been infound to: a) have been in
violation of certain federalviolation of certain federal
laws; b) have been convictedlaws; b) have been convicted
during the 10-year periodduring the 10-year period
preceding the date ofpreceding the date of
furnishing the NRSROfurnishing the NRSRO
application; and c) have beenapplication; c) have been
punished for any crime that ispunished for any crime that is
punishable by imprisonmentpunishable by imprisonment
for a period of one or morefor a period of one or more
years, or a substantiallyyears, or a substantially
equivalent crime by a foreignequivalent crime by a foreign
court. (Section 4)court; and d) have failed to
file the required certifications
or to maintain adequate
financial and managerial
resources to consistently
produce credit ratings with
integrity. (Section 4)
Limitations on the SEC’sNone of the legislations rulesNone of the legislations rules
authority over NRSROson the SEC’s authority overon the SEC’s authority over
the NRSRO registrationthe NRSRO registration
process shall be interpreted toprocess shall be interpreted to
give the agency the authoritygive the agency the authority
to regulate the substance ofto regulate the substance of
credit ratings or thecredit ratings or the
procedures andprocedures and
methodologies by whichmethodologies by which
NRSROs determine ratings.NRSROs determine ratings.
Public availability ofGenerally, upon beingGenerally, upon being
information NRSROsregistered as an NRSRO byregistered as an NRSRO by
submit to the SECthe SEC, a credit ratingthe SEC, a credit rating
agency must make theagency must make the
information and documents itinformation and documents it
furnished to the agency asfurnished to the agency as
part of the registrationpart of the registration
process publicly available process publicly available
through either its website or through either its website or
an alternative readilyan alternative readily
accessible means.accessible means.



ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
SEC adoption of rules toThe SEC shall adopt rules orThe SEC shall adopt rules or
prevent misuse of nonpublicregulations to require policiesregulations to require policies
informationor procedures designed toor procedures designed to
prevent NRSROs from theprevent NRSROs from the
misuse of the material,misuse of the material,
nonpublic information thatnonpublic information that
they collect. (Section 4)they collect. (Section 4)
SEC adoption of rules forThe SEC, as it deemsThe SEC shall issue rules to
the prevention of conflictsnecessary or appropriate,prohibit, or require the
of interestshall adopt rules ormanagement and disclosure
regulations to prohibit, orof, any conflicts of interest
require the management orrelating to the issuance of
disclosure of, any conflicts ofratings by an NRSRO that
interest relating to theshall include (1) the manner
issuance of ratings by anof an NRSRO’s
NRSRO that shall include (1)compensation for ratings or
the manner of an NRSRO’s related services; (2) the
compensation for ratings orconsulting, advisory, or other
related services; (2) theservices provided by an
consulting, advisory, or otherNRSRO; (3) the nature of the
services provided by anbusiness ties, ownership
NRSRO; (3) the nature of theinterests, or other financial or
business ties, ownershippersonal associations between
interests, or other financial oran NRSRO and entities who
personal associations betweendo business with it; (4)
an NRSRO and entities whoaffiliations between an
do business with it; and (4)NRSRO and entities that
affiliations between anunderwrite the securities or
NRSRO and entities thatmoney market instruments
underwrite the securities orrated by the NRSRO; and (5)
money market instrumentsany other potential conflicts
rated by the NRSRO.of interest that the SEC
(Section 4)deems necessary for the
public interest or for the
protection of investors.
(Section 4)



ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
SEC adoption of rules forThe SEC may adopt rules orThe SEC may adopt rules or
the prevention ofregulations relating toregulations relating to
prohibited acts andNRSROs: (1) seeking NRSROs : (1) seeking
practicespayment for a credit ratingpayment for a credit rating
that has not been specificallythat has not been specifically
requested by the issuer (anrequested by the issuer (an
unsolicited rating); (2)unsolicited rating); (2)
conditioning or threateningconditioning or threatening
to condition the issuance of ato condition the issuance of a
credit rating on the issuerscredit rating on the issuers
purchase of other services orpurchase of other services or
products; (3) lowering orproducts; (3) lowering or
threatening to lower a creditthreatening to lower a credit
rating on, or refusing to rate,rating on, or refusing to rate,
securities or money marketsecurities or money market
instruments issued by an assetinstruments issued by an asset
pool unless a portion of thepool unless a portion of the
assets within such pool also isassets within such pool also is
rated by the NRSRO; and (4)rated by the NRSRO; and (4)
modifying or threatening tomodifying or threatening to
modify a credit rating ormodify a credit rating or
otherwise departing from itsotherwise departing from its
standard methodologies forstandard methodologies for
determining credit ratings,determining credit ratings,
based on whether an issuerbased on whether an issuer
pays or will pay for the creditpays or will pay for the credit
rating or any other of therating or any other of the
NRSRO’s services orNRSRO’s services or
products. (Section 4) products. (Section 4)
NRSRO requirements forEach NRSO shall designate aEach NRSO shall designate a
compliance officers andcompliance officer withcompliance officer with
financial condition dataresponsibility for ensuringresponsibility for ensuring
compliance with thecompliance with the
securities laws. securities laws.
In addition, the SEC is givenIn addition, the SEC is given
the authority to requirethe authority to require
NRSROs to provide it withNRSROs to provide it with
confidential, independentlyconfidential, independently
audited financial statementsaudited financial statements
on their financial conditions,on their financial conditions,
the specific nature of thethe specific nature of the
filings and the intervalfilings and the interval
between such filings to bebetween such filings to be
determined by the agency.determined by the agency.
(Section 4)(Section 4)
Notice to other agencies ofWithin 30 days after the dateWithin 30 days after the date
the changes in theof enactment, the SEC shallof enactment, the SEC shall
treatment of the termnotify federal agencies whosenotify federal agencies whose
NRSROrules or regulations use therules or regulations use the
termnationally recognizedtermnationally recognized
statistical rating organizationstatistical rating organization
of the laws changes in theof the laws changes in the
treatment of the term.treatment of the term.
(Section 4)(Section 4)



ProvisionH.R. 2990S. 3850
No waiver of right of actionNone NRSRO registration does not
and no creation of a privateconstitute a waiver of any
right of actionright that the NRSRO might
otherwise have under state or
federal law. No reports
provided by an NRSRO shall
create a private right of
action. (Section 4)
Review of existingWithin 360 days after theWithin 270 days after the
regulationsdate of enactment, the SECdate of enactment, the SEC
shall review its existing rulesshall review its existing rules
and regulations that employand regulations that employ
the termnationallythe termnationally
recognized statistical ratingrecognized statistical rating
organization” or “NRSROorganization” or “NRSRO
and promulgate new orand amend or revise such
revised rules and regulationsrules in accordance with the
as it deems necessary forgoals of this law as it deems
either the public interest ornecessary for either the public
the protection of investors.interest or the protection of
(Section 4)investors. (Section 4)
Conforming amendmentsProvides for conformingProvides for conforming
amendments to severalamendments to several
Federal statutes, including theFederal statutes, including the
Securities Exchange Act ofSecurities Exchange Act of
1934, the Investment1934, the Investment
Company Act of 1940, theCompany Act of 1940, the
Investment Advisers Act ofInvestment Advisers Act of
1940, and the Housing and1940, and the Housing and
Community Development ActCommunity Development Act
of 1992.of 1992.
a. In the qualitative approach information is gleaned from analysts’ trips to the rated firm. In the
quantitative approach information is gleaned from the rated firms publicly available financial
statements.